There's recently been precedent for this in the House of Commons. The Speaker gets a casting vote, and one of the recent Brexitty votes was at something like 308 against -309 for after the MPs had voted. He said that he had to vote 'for', because if he'd voted 'against' then it would have tied the vote. His argument was that the Speaker's role should only ever be mediator, not influencer.PeteProdge wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:11 pmNope, never! We must have a winner, in this entirely fairly-set competitive race.DouglasReynholm wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:09 pm I see they are even again. Just close the thread here and accept they are both equally loved by different people for different reasons. Both great games.
Looks like I'll be playing both tonight and then probably casting a vote tomorrow, just before the poll ends, to break any deadlock.
(Although, at time of writing it is 51% in WTSS's favour.)
I'm not sure this has any relevance to the current situation at all, really, but I've typed it now, so...there you are.