Frankly this sounds quite reasonable to me...
Head over Heels back on Steam
- Einar Saukas
- Bugaboo
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:48 pm
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
And me too. Very reasonable.
However, we can't ignore the fact that the aggressive policing of the Horace IP regarding Octavius is well out of order and concerns about sexualising Horace are just plain weird. It's one local example, but it's generally concerning. He's seen the response - a bewilderment of horny horaces all over twitter and ill-will towards his own commercial projects. I hope he's capable of realising he's massively dropped a bollock and learns accordingly.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
There's nothing "alleged" about it. Mel Croucher spoke to The Register anonymously about not being paid over Automata games on the Vega, then Fogarty went and named him on twitter. Mark Cale of System 3 also had his games taken down because Fogarty was going around saying Cale was lying about not being paid.
-
- Manic Miner
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:54 pm
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Yip. He also has the right to protect his trademarks, but it was the manner he did it in that grates.R-Tape wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:17 am
And me too. Very reasonable.
However, we can't ignore the fact that the aggressive policing of the Horace IP regarding Octavius is well out of order and concerns about sexualising Horace are just plain weird. It's one local example, but it's generally concerning. He's seen the response - a bewilderment of horny horaces all over twitter and ill-will towards his own commercial projects. I hope he's capable of realising he's massively dropped a bollock and learns accordingly.
Incidently, you can see his other trademarks at https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmown ... 8&domain=1
Look at the state of that Manic Miner logo and sprite. FFS!
Here’s what I think about all this. I thi [REDACTED]
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
I think the overreaction to this is the thing that annoys me. He got in touch with YouTube because he was unhappy how his IP was being used. It wasn't because he owns the IP and doesn't want anyone to use it or he wanted them taken down for commercial reasons. He was unhappy how it was being used in a sexual manner. That's his prerogative. YouTube then issued copyright strikes against Octavius Kitten, how YouTube administers its copyright management might be very hard lined, but it's a company that deals with 300+ videos being uploaded a minute. It likely doesn't care or have time for a YouTuber that has under 10k views per video.
However, the mob like thinking to then attack him, including threats of physical violence, when he hadn't even given his side of the story, unfortunately is a sad reflection of British retro gaming. It's also sad that one of the "good guys" when it comes to IP is now being attacked. He was behind the original Vega and The 64, he's clearly stated he's happy for any of his IP to be used as long as there is a charitable donation if the game is sold commercially and yet there's a mob mentality to hound him out.
However, the mob like thinking to then attack him, including threats of physical violence, when he hadn't even given his side of the story, unfortunately is a sad reflection of British retro gaming. It's also sad that one of the "good guys" when it comes to IP is now being attacked. He was behind the original Vega and The 64, he's clearly stated he's happy for any of his IP to be used as long as there is a charitable donation if the game is sold commercially and yet there's a mob mentality to hound him out.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Don't you think that's absurd? Anyway, I don't even recall there being anything that saucy.toot_toot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:01 am I think the overreaction to this is the thing that annoys me. He got in touch with YouTube because he was unhappy how his IP was being used. It wasn't because he owns the IP and doesn't want anyone to use it or he wanted them taken down for commercial reasons. He was unhappy how it was being used in a sexual manner.
And with hindsight (surprised it's needed to be honest!), has he judged the mood of a significant portion of his potential customer base well?That's his prerogative.
-
- Manic Miner
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:54 pm
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
I guess we will have to agree to disagree!
He has stated he is more than happy with any IP he owns can be used, as long as his company is credited and if it's a commercial release, that his company's license fees are donated to charity. If he does continue with that approach, then at least he's acquired some IP that are now free from being exploited from the likes of the company that bought the Head over Heels licence, amongst others, or the likes of Tim Langdell who claimed to own the rights to the use of the name "Edge" in anything to do with games. Hopefully Andrews continues with that viewpoint and this incident hasn't made him change his mind.
I'd much rather see IP rights being bought up by someone who is part of the retro community and is happy with the games being freely distributed, but any commercial usage needs to be donated to charity. Or else we end up with someone like Atari suing everyone under the sun, like for using Breakout in a Kit Kat advert!
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
This thing about charities donations is just an excuse. GRRRR
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Why can't people move on and create new stuff ? Specially if the old stuff is troublesome or negative.
Move on and create an original character, with no problems attached, and make your videos, games, etc. in peace.
Move on and create an original character, with no problems attached, and make your videos, games, etc. in peace.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Because people still care about Sabreman, Horace, Miner Willy and Monty Mole.Why can't people move on and create new stuff ? Specially if the old stuff is troublesome or negative.
But they won't care about Cutlassboy, Virgilio, Fred the Milkman and Bobby Badger
-
- Manic Miner
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2018 1:07 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Because it's mostly about nostalgia.
Multiplayer Feud: https://stephensmith.itch.io/feud-online
- Juan F. Ramirez
- Bugaboo
- Posts: 5137
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2017 6:55 am
- Location: Málaga, Spain
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
I would add characters like Horace are true 80s icons.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
People need to take a closer look at the Miner Willy sprite image he's trademarked. A really close look.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Another land grab. The thing about IP is that it stands for intellectual property. There is nothing intellectual about recent events.
- Einar Saukas
- Bugaboo
- Posts: 3143
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:48 pm
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Hmm? Doesn't it contradict the idea that "he's fine with people using Horace and other IPs he owns, except if they’re sold commercially that the company makes a donation to charity instead of the license fee"?
Hmm? If he registered an IP complain at YouTube, did he expect Youtube do do anything different?toot_toot wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:01 amYouTube then issued copyright strikes against Octavius Kitten, how YouTube administers its copyright management might be very hard lined, but it's a company that deals with 300+ videos being uploaded a minute. It likely doesn't care or have time for a YouTuber that has under 10k views per video.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
This is hilarious. Whoever took this and laid claim to it is obviously not a real spectrum fan. This stuff should just be in the public domain now anyway.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Maybe the changes were done on purpose, to avoid copyright issues with the existing art. Why else go to the trouble of modifying the logo and the loading screen colours?
That way he can sell merchandise or whatever using the modified art without getting into trouble, and people who don't look too closely will accept it as the original.
That way he can sell merchandise or whatever using the modified art without getting into trouble, and people who don't look too closely will accept it as the original.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
It's because the original is just too damn sexy.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
Apparently this person and her assistant were also involved in making and selling soft toy Horaces for £35 each, had previously agreed to make a donation to the MS Society and then gone back on that agreement claiming Andrews didn't own the ip. It's nowhere near as clear-cut and out of the blue that the Youtuber originally inferred it was.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:43 pmHmm? Doesn't it contradict the idea that "he's fine with people using Horace and other IPs he owns, except if they’re sold commercially that the company makes a donation to charity instead of the license fee"?
-
- Manic Miner
- Posts: 390
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 3:54 pm
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
I think it needs to be made clear that 2 people here aren't connected other than just being friends and that these are 2 separate "incidents". The person making the plushies isn't an assistant. There are elements where it's now coming down to who you believe - facts being distorted and/or ignored.StooB wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 10:20 am Apparently this person and her assistant were also involved in making and selling soft toy Horaces for £35 each, had previously agreed to make a donation to the MS Society and then gone back on that agreement claiming Andrews didn't own the ip. It's nowhere near as clear-cut and out of the blue that the Youtuber originally inferred it was.
You're right, it's never clear cut, and not just from the YouTuber point of view either.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
They're two completely separate cases, dude. Octy made videos and didn't sell anything. The soft toys happened a while back and was nothing to do with Octavius.StooB wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 10:20 amApparently this person and her assistant were also involved in making and selling soft toy Horaces for £35 each, had previously agreed to make a donation to the MS Society and then gone back on that agreement claiming Andrews didn't own the ip. It's nowhere near as clear-cut and out of the blue that the Youtuber originally inferred it was.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Fri Oct 18, 2019 11:43 pm Hmm? Doesn't it contradict the idea that "he's fine with people using Horace and other IPs he owns, except if they’re sold commercially that the company makes a donation to charity instead of the license fee"?
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
I don’t think that’s quite true, although it’s difficult to get the entire story behind this. Paul Andrews said in his statement that Retro Princess was acting as a main point of contact for Octavius Kitten. Paul Andrews contacted Retro Princess about having a charitable donation if they continued making the Horace plushy. He also told Retro Princess he wasn’t happy how Horace was being used in Octavius Kittens video. He may have presumed, rightly or wrongly, that the information was going back to Octavius Kitten. But when he was blocked from contacting Retro Princess after being told she disputed he owned the IP, he then issued the takedowns.ZXDunny wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:19 pmThey're two completely separate cases, dude. Octy made videos and didn't sell anything. The soft toys happened a while back and was nothing to do with Octavius.StooB wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 10:20 am Apparently this person and her assistant were also involved in making and selling soft toy Horaces for £35 each, had previously agreed to make a donation to the MS Society and then gone back on that agreement claiming Andrews didn't own the ip. It's nowhere near as clear-cut and out of the blue that the Youtuber originally inferred it was.
But there is definitely more to this than on the surface, from all parties involved.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
There's your problem right there. You said "if they continued" unless you're being uncharacteristically charitable and assigning a non-binary pronoun but something tells me that's not the case here.toot_toot wrote: ↑Sat Oct 19, 2019 1:45 pmI don’t think that’s quite true, although it’s difficult to get the entire story behind this. Paul Andrews said in his statement that Retro Princess was acting as a main point of contact for Octavius Kitten. Paul Andrews contacted Retro Princess about having a charitable donation if they continued making the Horace plushy. He also told Retro Princess he wasn’t happy how Horace was being used in Octavius Kittens video. He may have presumed, rightly or wrongly, that the information was going back to Octavius Kitten. But when he was blocked from contacting Retro Princess after being told she disputed he owned the IP, he then issued the takedowns.
But there is definitely more to this than on the surface, from all parties involved.
Octavius was not involved in the soft toys thing. You're literally conflating the two issues. I don't know how I can make it any clearer for you. I can explain it for you but I cannot understand it for you.
Re: Head over Heels back on Steam
The "they" comes from Andrews' statement:
Clearly Andrews believes she was involved.Andrews wrote:This person also acts as a point of contact for her friend a youtuber. They went on to make public statements they wished to find replacement retro characters to produce toys with but did not wish to make charity donations to others which might also request them.