He also shared the official poster by Papu:
https://twitter.com/druellan/status/1440640196152729604
When Peter wrote "fixed", he was referring to old WoS incorrectly crediting you for "re-publishing" certain type-ins.
Martijn considered the name assigned by the original magazine publication as the main official name, and the in-game name as an alias. Regardless of the order, we should certainly have both. I will take a look at this!TMD2003 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:37 pm Finally, Jim Grimwood always opted for the name the programmer had chosen within the listing rather than the name that Sinclair Programs or Sinclair User assigned to it, hence Shuttle Master should be renamed to Space Shuttle if we're to keep in line with his way of doing things.
Eish.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:50 pmMartijn considered the name assigned by the original magazine publication as the main official name, and the in-game name as an alias. Regardless of the order, we should certainly have both. I will take a look at this!TMD2003 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:37 pm Finally, Jim Grimwood always opted for the name the programmer had chosen within the listing rather than the name that Sinclair Programs or Sinclair User assigned to it, hence Shuttle Master should be renamed to Space Shuttle if we're to keep in line with his way of doing things.
But according to this criteria, Insector Hecti in the Interchange should be renamed to "Inter-Change", because that's the title that the author intended (as seen in-game). It was the publisher that decided to release it under a different title. Many other commercial games would be renamed too.TMD2003 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 12:10 amEish.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:50 pm Martijn considered the name assigned by the original magazine publication as the main official name, and the in-game name as an alias. Regardless of the order, we should certainly have both. I will take a look at this!
This is going to result in quite a few changes along the way, and it's likely that there'll be no coherence in which names is used and when.
I can see JimG's point about using the names the original authors put into their games, because it was Sinclair User making editorial decisions over their heads that resulted in all the changed names. Sometimes it might have been necessary - such as a game based on "Play Your Cards Right" being called "Play Your Cards Right" by the author but being renamed "Higher Lower" by SU when they got scared of ITV's lawyers paying them too much attention - but in many cases I can't see any good reason why SU would have overruled the author of the program. What is for certain is that the name the author intended will always be the first one given on The Type Fantastic, with the italic title afterwards either being one that the magazine in question gave, or is the title of the main article in which the program was a subsection (which is more likely in ZX Computing, for instance, than in Sinclair Programs).
I would favour using the names JimG indexed the programs under, with the "Also known as" section reserved for the italic title.
Example: Baseball, a.k.a. Every Pitcher Tells A Story from ZX Computing.
It's not so simple!
However you sent us new originals for all these 4 games. If these games already had originals, why did you send new files? What's wrong with existing originals and why should we replace them? Or should we add your new originals and keep old ones too (only removing the modified versions)?
Hi [mention]Einar Saukas[/mention], that's probably down to the way I asked [mention]TMD2003[/mention] to package the files. I asked him with each game to make sure we had as close to the original listing as possible. The only changes being if the game didn't run as published. He would have just included it for completeness. Use the one in the archive we sent over.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 4:43 am However you sent us new originals for all these 4 games. If these games already had originals, why did you send new files? What's wrong with existing originals and why should we replace them?
What I'd have sent in those cases would be the file from The Type Fantastic, extracted from the multi-listing packages that Jim hosted - identical to what I've linked to above, so there'd be no inconsistencies there.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Sat Sep 25, 2021 4:43 am For instance, in your previous post you wrote:
However you sent us new originals for all these 4 games. If these games already had originals, why did you send new files? What's wrong with existing originals and why should we replace them? Or should we add your new originals and keep old ones too (only removing the modified versions)?
Listen to Dave, everyone. And listen to this:
[mention]Einar Saukas[/mention] If you use the online tool, you don't care about entry ID, zipping and proper renaming at all. It's the main point of that tool, just upload the file and the rest is fully automated proccess.Einar Saukas wrote: ↑Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:50 pm If anyone can help in these tasks, we will really appreciate it! Just get the TAP or TZX file for a certain type-in from TTFN, then zip and rename it properly (filename without spaces with extension ".tap.zip" or ".tzx.zip"). Find the corresponding page at SC to obtain the correct entry ID. Use Pavel's online tool (option "Add new files for existing ZXDB title/entry"). Afterwards, if there was already a modified file in this entry, please post here indicating what's the original and the modified file, and we will remove the other.